This week is All Aboard week in Ireland, essayed at “Building Confidence in Digital Skills for Learning”. I am speaking today in the gorgeous city of Galway on this topic, and came across this paper in a recent BJET which gives some useful context. It summarises interviews with 33 Australian academics from various disciplines, on the topic of why they used technology in assessment. While the particular lens is on assessment, I think there are some useful things to note for those espousing the incorporation of technology generally.
Four themes emerge from the interviews
The first is that there is a perceived cost-benefit analysis at play; the cost of establishing an assessment process (e.g. quizzes) was perceived to be offset by the benefit that it would offer, such as reducing workload in the long-run. However, some responses suggest that this economic bet didn’t pay off, and that lack of time meant that academics often took quick solutions or those they knew about, such as multiple choice quizzes.
The second theme is that technology was adopted because it is considered contemporary and innovative; this suggests a sense of inevitability of using tools as they are there. A (mildly upsetting) quote from an interview is given:
“It would have been nice if we could have brainstormed what we wanted students to achieve, rather than just saying “well how can ICT be integrated within a subject?”
The third theme was one around the intention to shape students’ behaviour – providing activities to guide them through learning. There was a sense that this was expected and welcomed by students.
Finally, at the point of implementation, significant support was required, which often wasn’t forthcoming, and because of this, and other factors, intentions had to be compromised.
The authors use these themes to make some points about the process of advocating and supporting those integrating technology. I like their point about “formative development” – rolling out things over multiple iterations and thus lowering the stakes. Certainly my own experience (in hindsight!) reflects the benefit of this.
One other aspect of advocacy that isn’t mentioned but I think could be is to provide a framework upon which you hang your approaches. Giving students quizzes “coz it helps them revise” probably isn’t a sufficient framework, and nor is “lecture capture coz we can”. I try to use the framework of cognitive load theory as a basis for a lot of what I do, so that I have some justification for when things are supported or not, depending on where I expect students to be at in their progression. It’s a tricky balance, but I think such a framework at least prompts consideration of an overall approach rather than a piecemeal one.
There’s a lovely graphic from All Aboard showing lots of technologies, and as an awareness tool it is great. But there is probably a huge amount to be done in terms of digital literacy, regarding both the how, but also the why, of integrating technology into our teaching approaches.
I was very interested to see that the University of New South Wales (UNSW) are planning a complete re design of 600 courses for the digital age. What this means…. I do not know. I hope that this link works for anyone outside of Australia:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/unsw-reboots-curriculum-with-an-eye-on-the-digital-age/news-story/f8bf0a221bc70f3f677b2ee6aa1f261a
If it doesn’t, the article basically says that UNSW will spend $77 million to rebuild 600 large cohort classes over the next 5 years. “The idea is to restructure subjects around the capabilities of modern digital technology and the culture and learning modes of Generation Z.” Has anything of this sort been done in the UK or other universities around the world?
As I understand it Uni of Northampton here are building a new campus with no theatres. Everything will be flipped with small teaching. Isn’t Adelaide going the same way? Quite daring experiments!
Thanks Michael for this interesting writeup of our work. Just wanted to say that we also produced a bunch of resources for educators from those interviews, as well as some other papers – all available/linked from our site http://assessmentdecisions.org